Stolen Elections
Voting accountability is like cash flow reporting
Those who count the votes must prove that the numbers they report are accurate. If they cannot, then the election results must be discarded as untrustworthy. Another, more reliable — utterly reliable — election must occur.

cross-posted from: > What really needs to be investigated is how Obama judges always seem to end up overseeing cases involving conservatives and then ruling against them.

Or were they more likely to be registered by some left wing voter registration effort, but not actually vote. So "somebody" may have voted for them

cross-posted from: > Here are just a few examples: > - $1.7 million against Freedom Caucus member Madison Cawthorn in NC-11; > - $2 million in WA-3 against Joe Kent, and $2 million to prop up Kent’s primary opponent; > - $1.5 million spent against Carl Paladino in NY-23; > - $1 million against Christian Collins in TX-8; > - at least $1 million against Karoline Leavitt in NH-1; > - various amounts against J. R. Majewski in OH-9 and David Giglio in CA-13; and finally, > - $1.5 million against me in FL-7, a safe Republican seat, where McCarthy surrogates ran false and negative ads through “American Liberty Action PAC,” one of the four McCarthy attack PACs controlled by his surrogates. > > The list goes on.

cross-posted from: > The Maricopa County election officials were served with a subpoena to provide election records by 9:30 AM on Monday. > > So Maricopa County officials moved their planned 9:30 AM meeting to 8:00 AM on Monday. > > They don’t even hide their deceit and fraud. They really don’t care. > > Republicans believed they were dealing with honest Americans. Once again, they were fooled.

Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer’s Founding of Partisan PAC Raises Ethical and Legal Questions of Possible Misconduct
cross-posted from: > While Richer’s PAC claims to support Republicans, it has received money from a man who donates to almost exclusively Democrats. Francis Najafi gave $20,000 to his PAC, $60,000 to the Arizona Democratic Party, and $5,300 to Democratic Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs, who is running for governor. > > Much of the money Richer’s PAC raised has gone to reimburse him for things like airfare, food, and other “operating expenses.” None of it appears to have gone to any candidate.

cross-posted from: > Bolsonaro’s party’s request calls for the nation’s electoral authority to “apply the legal consequences it deems necessary” in response to the discovery that electronic voting machines manufactured before the year 2020 used in the 2022 presidential election did not document individual identification numbers in internal logs. The party also claimed to find software inconsistencies not present in models built after 2020.

For a candidate, it helps to know your customer – so the RNC provided “big data lists” to statewide candidates. The RNC enhanced the lists with more data – like whether someone is “leaning Republican.” The happy candidates gave the lists, with a phone or tablet app to canvassers who went door-to-door to talk to those customers – voters. But they weren’t there! A funny thing happened on the way to the customer – the lists were a total “disaster.” Their words – the canvassers. The RNC experienced the same thing with the same lists in 2020, had two years to clean them up, and didn’t. They chose to focus on more important things, like funding opposition to America-First candidates.

These same counties destroyed their electronic ballots, which is against the law during the period that the law stipulates they be maintained. The paper ballots are the only thing

cross-posted from: > Orders came down from Washington, DC, and the office of @gopchairwoman, to stand down. They left the Arizona candidates and voters on the field to bleed while they scampered back to DC or went on vacation. > > > Her re-election as RNC Chair is more important to her than the voters of Arizona. 168 people vote in the RNC Chairman election. Three come from each state. Call the RNC Representative in your state and let them know how disappointed you are. Always be polite and respectful.

“Whistleblowers are coming forward and the curtain is being lifted. Whether done accidentally or intentionally. It is clear that this election was a debacle that destroyed any trust in our elections.”

Democrats are already facing the loss of another seat with a recount for a statehouse seat where the candidates receives the same number of votes. If the New Hampshire Ballot Law Commission can’t resolve the tie, a vote of the newly-seated Legislature will decide its outcome. O’Brien, who is a former speaker of the New Hampshire House of Representatives, said the secretary of state never declared a winner in the race, but instead only posted results prior to a discrepancy discovery when the secretary of state conducted an audit of the gubernatorial race in the same district.

Not only does this case rejuvenate the EIPCa’s effort to clean up California’s corrupt election law, but it may give standing to other candidates nationwide who challenge election laws. Lake v Hobbs, for example, is pending appeal in the very same Ninth Circuit. The case was dismissed in August 2022 for a lack of standing because “they have articulated only conjectural allegations of potential injuries that are in any event barred by the Eleventh Amendment, and seek relief that the Court cannot grant under the Purcell principle.” Fast forward to the 2022 General Election ripe with widespread machine failure and/or manipulation and it seems the Lake v Hobbs case may have been rather significant in ensuring the election was safe and fair. Hopefully the Lake Campaign is given a fair opportunity to make their case, finally, in a court of “law”.

Stenstrom testified that he saw a cart of between 20,000 and 30,000 pre-canvassed ballots without pedigree at the Wharf on Election Night and that at 8:05 p.m., about 25,000 votes almost immediately appeared with lopsided margin for Democrats.

cross-posted from: > Since the massive fraud during the runoff election on October 30th in Brazil, millions of Brazilians have been protesting on the streets every day against electoral fraud by Communist convicted criminal Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. > > Mainstream media such as O Globo refuse to report on what may be the largest protests the world has ever seen, fueling even more rage and disappointment among the Brazilian people. > > On Thursday, the far-left court ordered banks to block funds from at least 42 agricultural entrepreneurs supporting President Jair Bolsonaro. > > Supreme Court Minister Alexandre de Moraes ordered the blocking of the bank accounts of at least 42 individuals and companies in Mato Grosso, suspected of financing the protests, CBN reported.

Lake’s campaign spent $2 million to monitor the counting of votes and to be prepared with lawsuits based on the facts when necessary. Time said 40 lawyers were in one central “war room” while roving attorneys monitor polling places and vote-counting operations. “This is the most robust Election Day operation and post-election operation that Arizona has ever seen,” Brady Smith, the Lake campaign’s chief political strategist, said.

Election Fraud 2.0! O.K., So What Are You Gonna Do About It?
The Democrat, leftist ballot strategy has one absolute, must have, ingredient: Floating ballots. A floating ballot is the one that goes to 434 Prescott Street for Bill Jones. But the address is an apartment building, so it cannot be delivered because it does not indicate that Bill is Unit 34. That free-floating ballot is collected by someone – and eventually voted. This happens in almost every state in about every multi-unit building. We saw it in many states in 2020 and 2022. In 2022, innovative Republican candidates, a very few, mailed postcards to every voter in their congressional district. The cards that came back = NON-DELIVERABLE ADDRESS. They challenged ballots sent to these addresses, and perhaps they sent volunteers to find some of those accumulated ballots. I had two hours to find at-scale phantom voters in one of the reddest states and present them to a group of 20 lawyers after my first cup of coffee the following morning. It wasn’t hard. Voters registered in prison. People voting from homeless shelters – for 20 years. (Homeless shelters do not have 20-year residents, don’t email me about this). Active voters in a frat house who were 106 years old, and a voter who was 1,900 years old who registered to vote, just before the 2020 election. The response from this Republican secretary of state was complete denial. No matter how crazy the phantom’s address was – like a jail – he refused to concede there was any phantom inhabitation of his state’s voter rolls. We now run about 20 states and they are all like this. Phantom voter fraud is the heart and soul of ballot-harvesting election-stealing.

cross-posted from: > Cobb County, Georgia Election Officials discovered 789 uncounted ballots from the Kennesaw 3A precinct which caused Burnette to win by 31 votes.

cross-posted from: > “Maricopa County has admitted that[,] in some voting locations, ‘Door 3’ non-tabulated ballots were commingled with tabulated ballots at the voting location,” > > State law was apparently violated when poll workers failed to keep ballots that were successfully tabulated on site segregated from those that were not. > > Wright also wanted to know the instructions poll workers gave to voters who experienced problems with their ballots being accepted by tabulation machines. > > Wright also wanted to know the instructions poll workers gave to voters who experienced problems with their ballots being accepted by tabulation machines. > > Chairman Gates publicly stated that voters who had already checked in to e-Pollbook, but were having difficulties voting could ‘check out’ of that voting location, and would be able to nonetheless vote in another voting location,” she wrote. > > “Based on sworn complaints received by the Unit, not only have poll workers reported that they were not trained and/or not provided with information on how to execute ‘check out’ procedures, but many voters have reported the second voting location required the voter to cast a provisional ballot as the e-Pollbooks maintained the voter had cast a ballot in the original voting location.” she added. > > Wright pointed out that Arizona state law prohibits a voter to cast a provisional ballot who has already been signed in electronically.

Tyranny begins when elections are stolen and the government loses the consent of the governed.

  • 0 users online
  • 1 user / day
  • 1 user / week
  • 2 users / month
  • 5 users / 6 months
  • 8 subscribers
  • 800 Posts
  • Modlog